Pardon me while the page is loading...

Bad News
Case Study

An open system empowering citizens to challenge the news media and hold them accountable when they do "bad" things.

Overview

Consumers can use Bad News to confront the news media. It includes resources for reporting bias, inaccuracy, and outright propaganda. Bad News aggregates these reports and provides statistical analysis. The offending news sources are automatically sent email notification with the hope they will make corrections and improve their reporting practices.

On its own, the primary objective of the app is to improve the overall quality of news. Within the context of my portfolio, the purpose of the work showcased here is to demonstrate my skills and familiarity with recent tools and services that are likely to be encountered by a UX Designer.

TIMELINE: 7 Weeks / MAR 2025
ORG: Peter Klein Productions, LLC
ROLE(S): Project Lead

DESIGN TOOLKIT:

Visual Studio Code
Figma
React
TypeScript
TailWind
Adobe Photoshop

Adobe After Effects
Lovable
Google Optimize
Google Sheets
Google Forms

The Problem

American trust in news media has been trending downward since 1976. Today, trust in what's reported by the news media is the lowest on record.

The lies told by the media have become so transparent, everyone can sense it, if not consciously then subconsciously.

Today I can't find alternative perspectives on a story, even though the Internet is bigger and faster.

We're all paying the costs for allowing the media to consolidate. Fewer sources means less actual news.

The news being reported today is measurably less accurate and arguably of lower quality. There's a growing concensus that the primary cause for this is a combination of reporting bias, propaganda, and even corrupt practices.

Making matters worse, the media have blocked or eliminated comment sections and other means to provide media producers with feedback. Americans have few means to voice their disapproval and many feel disenfranchised.

As the below chart shows, of different groups being considered ranging from local governments to the federal government, Americans have the least trust and confidence in the "mass media."

The Challenge

Given this historically low trust in the media, the primary goal for this project was to improve the quality of, & trust in main-stream news. The practical goal was thus to build a platform with which to achieve this — to demonstrate a viable framework.

Creating an app that allows users to critique the news media will certainly be a complex task. It must be designed in a way that encourages users to actively participate in reporting activity while also providing them with an easy-to-use interface. Finally, security measures must be implemented to protect user data.

The Status of the App & My Role

I don't plan to complete the Bad News app for distribution before I land a new job. Having recently been introduced to a few like-minded individuals with some great new services that compliment my concept, I expect to uncover some features to incorporate that will unfold as time permits.

As journalism is something I have personal experience with, I had the idea for a similar app in the past. Being active in pursuit of a new job in UX design, I needed to build skills using cutting-edge tools in a few areas. It made perfect sense for me to begin work on Bad News as the means to become familiar with these tools. It seemed like a smart addition to my portfolio as well. Therefore, what you see is, at the very least, a demonstration of my UX design skills and, at the very most, a demonstration of a workable framework with great potential.

Design Process

As this project is only to demonstrate a viable framework, some design processes have been limited in scope or were unnecessary. But I still made use of the well proven pattern of...

  1. Empathize with Users
  2. Define Pain Points
  3. Ideate Solutions
  4. Create Wireframes & Prototypes
  5. Test & Iterate on Designs

Competitive Audit

Searching for anything similar to my app concept found nothing in the form of an app and little in other forms. However, there are web services that seek to present news with accompanying bias or partisan influence. The purpose of which is to better inform the user/reader and curb any value the material has as propaganda. In this audit I find that both services examined do a fair job of overcoming challenges, but leave much desired.

General Information


Competitor

Users

Product Offering

Unque Value
AllSides
allsides.com
AllSides Logo
More discerning news consumers
Provides balanced news while providing media bias ratings of news sources. Available as a website, and Android/iOS app.
Provides patented technologies, tools and services to identify biases in news & sources, providing bias ratings for over 1,400 outlets. Delivers multiple perspectives on topics. Most services/data is provided to companies and end users.
Ground News
ground.news
News Ground Logo
More discerning news consumers
A platform that analyzes news stories to highlight your personal bias while illuminating blind spots. Available as a website, Android/iOS app & browser extension.
They process over 50,000 articles from over 50,000 sources, merge stories on the same topic into one, making it possible to get multiple perspectives in one place. Their media bias rating system is based on data from 3 bias ranking sources, including AllSides.

User Experience


Competitor

User Flow

Tone

Desktop Experience

Accessibility
AllSides
allsides.com
AllSides Logo
OKAY
+ Information is fairly well organized
- Almost no branding, use of cues or language to highlight or draw attention to unique features or sections. Very little effort to clearly divide data and external content from company service info and news about the company.
Generally upbeat and solution focused. Very good at promoting the positive aspects of their services.
RATING
+ News seems current. Links to main content areas are somewhat easy to find
.- Appearance is like run-of-the-mill news aggregate, lacking any visual cues or branding of their unique features.
OUTSTANDING
+ Lighthouse Accessibility rating of 96
- Only 75 Best Practices rating
Ground News
ground.news
News Ground Logo
GOOD
+ Good effort to guide the viewer into content and then guide the eye to defined features on the page/screen.
Very negative, even a bit depressing. Seems to focus on the problem more than the solution.
RATING
+ Pretty good means of displaying news in the context of bias highlighting.
- Confusing overlayed ball graphics & pop-up messages when hovering in places.
OKAY
+ Lighthouse Accessibility rating of only 73
- Only 75 Best Practices rating

Identifying Users

Only when a real-world user base has been identified can any meaningful user goals, frustrations and problems emerge for consideration. And I didn't want to overlook any prospective users. Basic user research was conducted prior to taking on the project, supplemented by competitive research and brainstorming.

With that data and some analysis, we can ideate solutions and forge ahead with specific users in mind. Based on the most common demographics and key user problems identified, 6 user personas were developed. These were fabricated amalgamations of typical users to help guide the solutions being designed. Here are 2 examples...

Erica Persona

As you can see from above, Erica is unique in that she not only seeks to improve the quality of news, but she also wishes to advocate on behalf of others.

Saadah Persona

Saadah is more typical of prospective users. The twist in his profile is that he has the goal to become an independent journalist himself.

Primary System Functions / Features

At its core, the platform will contain the following functional areas...

Reporting System

The system through which users report "bad news."

Tracking System

The system which will house the reporting data, analyze the data and produce reports for users and the general public.

Automated Notification System

The system which will, based on various predetermined triggers automatically send reports to oversight agencies and notifications to a set of key recipients.

Publishing/Promotion System

The system which will compile and format various reports in a variety of styles for publishing through the general media and platform social media channels.

5 Ways to Structure Info on 4 Screens

One of the exercises in my Google UX Design coursework was to rapidly sketch "5 ways to structure info." Early in conceptualization of Bad News I came up with the following examples. The layouts that worked best are highlighted.

Screen 1

Screen 2

Screen 3

Screen 4

Wireframes & Consistency

I find Figma to be very helpful and it was essential to completing this project. But before getting to basic wireframes, I first sketched out how the critical screens would be structured. I put a much thought into the sketches, which I believe this comparison of before and after demonstrates.

High-Fidelity Figma Screens

During this process I became familiar with the methods of converting screen layouts into code; in my case, VS Code. Below are the final screens in Figma before being stripped of variable content and exported for coding with VS Code.

Logo Iterations

The brand, "Bad News" can be taken in the literal sense and viewed strictly as a negative connotation. But sometimes concepts aren't simple enough to convey in one or two words. The app's fundamental purpose is to allow for the reporting of "Bad News." Hence, the brand name. It's edgy, but makes sense. You can see from the iterations below how I tried to include the concept of the "media," which eventually came through the television symbology.

Usability Study - Bad News App

There's little doubt that the Reporting System will be the greatest challenge. Reporting is also the first step in the process which the other systems rely on to function. As such, this study focuses solely on the Reporting functions. It was developed but has yet to be undertaken.

research goals:
  • Determine if the design will lead to reports being submitted by people who presently distrust the news media.
  • Determine whether the app's structure, content and strategy leads to confusion or clarity with regard to the purpose of the app and how to use it.
  • Determine the overall design usability.
methodology:
  • Part Moderated, Part Independent usability study.
  • An online survey participant service will be utilized to build the body of survey participants.
  • Participants will be compensated indirectly by the service through which they will be acquired.
  • A screener survey will be used to ensure the participants meet the desired characteristics and agree to be recorded.
  • Study will be conducted online in 2 phases.
  • Phase 1: The first phase will be a two-way video conference in which questions will be asked and discussion will take place.
  • Phase 2: The second phase will be completion of an assigned task & completion of an online questionnaire.
  • Stakeholder #1 will conduct all video conferences with Participants.
  • 20 has been determined to be a sufficient number of Participants for the study. 22 will be selected to account for cancellations and no-shows.
questions to answer:
  • What motivates users to view reports and statistics on the app?
  • What motivates users to submit reports on the app?
  • What is the general opinion users have of main-stream news?
  • If a user’s opinion of main-stream news is more negative than positive, what do they think the cause is?
  • Do users who are likely to use the app in any manner hold conspiracy ideologies that are irrational?
  • Does the landing page and initial scan of the app inform the user of its purpose?
  • If any specific content confuses the user about what the app’s purpose is, what content and in what way is it confusing?
  • Does the app overall communicate professionalism and legitimacy?
  • Will users who submit reports be doing so to troll the news sources or primarily to improve the quality of news media in some way?
  • Does the average user prefer to register anonymously, and if so, why?
  • How likely is the average user to file more than 1 report?
  • How often will the average user use the app?
  • Does the average user think the mix of information and features is good?
  • What, if anything would the average user add or change, and why?
participants:
  • Participants must…
  • …have used at least 3 apps extensively, previously.
  • …are not themselves employed in any news or news related industry.
  • …be between 30 and 70 years old.
  • …be consumers of news from any source at least weekly.
  • Physical and mental abilities of Participants will be collected, but not used in the selection process.
  • Characteristics like gender, socio-economic status will be collected, but not used in the selection process.
PHASE 1:
Participant Completes Task & Questionnaire (Independent)
assigned tasks:
  • Freely browse the app to visit at least all the primary app sections.
  • Register as a user, either anonymously or publicly.
  • Submit one report about an incident, the details of which will be provided to them.
Questionnaire:
Participants will score the following statements by selecting one of five responses that range from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree.”
  • I found the general concept and purpose of the app to be easily determined.
  • I found the general concept and purpose of the app to be confusing and hard to ascertain.
  • There was too much information about news reporting and journalism.
  • There wasn’t enough information about news reporting and journalism.
  • I found the general user interface of the app easy to use.
  • I found the general user interface of the app difficult to use.
  • I think the app’s content and messaging welcomes and encourages users to submit reports.
  • I think the app overall is either fun to explore or interesting, which should invite continued use.
  • I found the app confusing.
  • I was unable to figure out how to register, submit a report, or use other features.
  • Open-Ended Question: Is there any feature the app didn’t have that you think should be added?
PHASE 2:
Video Conference Q&A (Moderated)
  • Welcome the Participant.
  • Thank the Participant for taking Part in the study.
  • Confirm that the Participant agrees to be recorded.
  • Confirm Participant’s answers on screener survey.
  • Are you differently abled, either physically or psychologically?
  • Inform the Participant of the second and last phase of the study.
  • Do you have any questions before we begin?
  • Advise the Participant they are not being tested, & to just be themselves.
  • Do you have a favorite news source, and if so, who are they and what medium to use to consume their news?
  • What is your opinion of the main-stream news overall at present?

User Flow

User flow is important to establish as early as possible. It can be helpful from conceptualization through developing user activity metrics. Below is a sample user flow from before even sketching the first wireframes.

User Flow

Minimum Viable Product Prototype

This has been more difficult to develop than other, seemingly complicated apps. I expect further development to be no less difficult. Adhering to restrictions and limitations in what can be reported and what constitutes an offense that are key to service integrity is important. It's no less key and probably required to maintain user interest that the experience be intuitive and rewarding.

Prototype Samples